Running Personal and Other Builds on Separate Jazz Build Engines


Jorge just blogged about an interesting option to have separate build engines for personal builds and general builds. This allows you to provide capacities for both build types and control which engines perform which work.

This is quite interesting, as it allows you to avoid situations where personal builds block integration builds from happening, just by setting a property in the build engine definition.

The roperty requestFilter can be set on a build engine. It accepts the values

  • personalBuild=false which filters out personal build requests and prevents the engine from picking them up
  • personalBuild=true which filters only for personal build requests

By providing several build engines (at least two) for a build definition with these filters set, you can control which build engine will pick up and serve which build request type.

This works for all types of builds that is controlled by the RTC “Request Build” mechanism and performed with a Jazz Build Engine, because the functionality is provided by the Jazz Build engine itself.

Jorge Díaz's Blog

The use of Personal Builds allow a developer to verify if their checked in changes build successfully without impacting the team build, or waiting for a deliver-build cycle. In this forum post I want to discuss how to configure your Rational Team Concert deployment to allow the parallelism of personal builds by your developers.

View original post 495 more words

Advertisements

About rsjazz

Hi, my name is Ralph. I work for IBM and help colleagues and customers with adopting the Jazz technologies.
This entry was posted in Jazz, RTC and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Running Personal and Other Builds on Separate Jazz Build Engines

  1. Mat says:

    Hi Ralph,
    I’ve got a question corresponding to builds on jazz platform. I would like to make two builds where one will be dependent from another one. When I click ‘request build’ on ‘build1’ it would run dependent ‘build2’ earlier. Do you think is it possible to do somethinh like that?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s